Export clean lists
From AWeber, export active subscribers (CSV) and suppress unsubscribed/bounced contacts before import. Migrating junk is how deliverability gets hurt.
Mailivate
AWeber alternative for senders who want a fresher stackAWeber has decades of email DNA and a loyal small-business base. Mailivate is the AWeber alternative when you want contemporary templates, clearer growth tiers, and tooling that feels built for how teams ship email now.
Stay on AWeber if its templates, list tools, and support model already fit. Move to Mailivate if you’re ready for a modern builder, mailbox replies, and Startup pricing that starts at $9/mo.
| Dimension | AWeber | Mailivate |
|---|---|---|
| Entry paid (approx.) | Lite from ~$15/mo | $9/mo Startup |
| Higher tier (approx.) | Plus from ~$30/mo | $22/mo Growth |
| Capacity example | Scales with subscribers; branding removal often on higher plan | 18,000–55,000 monthly sends depending on tier |
| Trial | Trial offers commonly available | 14-day trial |
AWeber commonly lists Lite from ~$15/mo and Plus from ~$30/mo (September 2026). Always confirm. Mailivate figures are from live billing config. Current Mailivate Startup is $9/mo and Growth is $22/mo.
| Feature | AWeber | Mailivate |
|---|---|---|
| Email campaigns | Yes | Yes |
| Landing pages | Yes (plan-dependent depth) | Focus on email + lists + automations |
| Automations | Yes | Yes (Growth+) |
| Templates | Large library heritage | Modern starter templates |
| Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Deliverability tooling | Long-running reputation | Domain auth + send hygiene focus |
| Multi-user | Yes | Yes |
| API | Yes | Growth+ |
Product visuals from Mailivate marketing surfaces — campaigns, audience workflows, and day-to-day email ops.
Campaign overview — see sends, lists, and next actions without digging through menus.
Campaign building — templates and drag-and-drop editing aimed at shipping, not configuring.
Audience + growth views — keep contacts, engagement, and follow-ups in one place.
From AWeber, export active subscribers (CSV) and suppress unsubscribed/bounced contacts before import. Migrating junk is how deliverability gets hurt.
In Mailivate, connect your domain (SPF/DKIM) before big sends. Warm up with engaged segments first — don’t blast the full list on day one.
Recreate welcome, abandoned interest, and win-back flows first. Archive dusty automations instead of cloning every legacy workflow.
Port brand colors, logos, and 2–3 proven layouts into Mailivate templates. Perfect pixels later — ship a working newsletter this week.
Send one campaign to a small engaged cohort on Mailivate while AWeber still handles the rest. Compare inbox placement and clicks, then cut over.
Comparison pages that only dunk on competitors aren’t useful. Here’s the real friction.
Composite scenarios based on common migration patterns — not invented 5-star quotes.
Ran AWeber Lite for a weekly tip email. Moved to Mailivate, rebuilt a 5-email nurture for a group program launch, and kept weekly tips on Startup until Growth made sense.
Needed cleaner templates for sponsorships. Migrated engaged readers only, set up post-alert emails, and used analytics to show open/click proof to sponsors.
If you’re starting fresh, Mailivate’s campaign-first flow is usually faster to first send. If you’re already fluent in AWeber, “better” depends on whether modernization is worth the switch cost.
Not if you authenticate your domain, import only healthy subscribers, and warm up. Hurt happens when people import raw uncleaned lists and blast immediately.
Yes — welcome and nurture-style automations are a core use case (especially on Growth).
Import a clean list and send a modern campaign this week.